Please do a bad job of putting your courses online

Thanks to the many of you who reached out to share that this post helped you through last spring’s sudden transition to emergency remote teaching.

If you are just now coming to this article, note that this was published in March 2020. It’s original audience is for educators, especially college professors, with little or no pedagogical or technological training in online teaching and who, during the early days of the pandemic, were unlikely to be able to get help from overwhelmed course designers or IT departments. As I state clearly at the end, this post is for that moment, when doing what might have felt like a “bad” job (not learning every new piece of technology, not editing your videos to reduce the “umms,” not boning up on 20 years of online pedagogy) allowed us to meet the needs of students best. To learn how to create high-quality online courses even as resources and support continues to be limited in many ways, explore other posts on this blog, including the series Online-by-Design, which offers easy-to-apply suggestions for building online courses informed by compassion for students, respect for content, and sound digital pedagogy.

Rebecca

I’m absolutely serious.

For my colleagues who are now being instructed to put some or all of the remainder of their semester online, now is a time to do a poor job of it. You are NOT building an online class. You are NOT teaching students who can be expected to be ready to learn online. And, most importantly, your class is NOT the highest priority of their OR your life right now. Release yourself from high expectations right now, because that’s the best way to help your students learn.

If you are getting sucked into the pedagogy of online learning or just now discovering that there are some pretty awesome tools out there to support students online, stop. Stop now. Ask yourself: Do I really care about this? (Probably not, or else you would have explored it earlier.) Or am I trying to prove that I’m a team player? (You are, and don’t let your university exploit that.) Or I am trying to soothe myself in the face of a pandemic by doing something that makes life feel normal? (If you are, stop and instead put your energy to better use, like by protesting in favor of eviction freezes or packing up sacks of groceries for kids who won’t get meals because public schools are closing.)

Remember the following as you move online:

  1. Your students know less about technology than you think. Many of them know less than you. Yes, even if they are digital natives and younger than you.
  2. They will be accessing the internet on their phones. They have limited data. They need to reserve it for things more important than online lectures.
  3. Students who did not sign up for an online course have no obligation to have a computer, high speed wifi, a printer/scanner, or a camera. Do not even survey them to ask if they have it. Even if they do, they are not required to tell you this. And if they do now, that doesn’t mean that they will when something breaks and they can’t afford to fix it because they just lost their job at the ski resort or off-campus bookstore.
  4. Students will be sharing their technology with other household members. They may have LESS time to do their schoolwork, not more.
  5. Many will be working MORE, not fewer, hours. Nurses, prison guards, firefighters, and police officers have to go to work no matter what. As healthcare demand increases but healthcare workers get sick, there will be more and  more stress on those who remain.
  6. Some of your students will get sick. Others will be caring for people who are ill.
  7. Many will be parenting.
  8. Social isolation contributes to mental health problems.
  9. Social isolation contributes to domestic violence.
  10. Students will be losing their jobs, especially those in tourism and hospitality.

All of these factors mean that your students are facing more important battles today than your class–if they are even able to access it.

creative E-learning Concept Book and Laptop 3d render

Photo by NosUA from Getty Images.

As you put your class online:

1. Put your energy into the classes that are required for your major or minor or that are required by other majors or minors. Electives and GE classes are an important part of a good education, but we have already decided that what students learn in any one of those courses is not vital. (The exceptions to this are GE courses that are required for a major.) For some of us, this is every class we teach, but for others, we have the ability to choose to focus our attention.

2. Do not require synchronous work. Students should not need to show up at a specific time for anything. REFUSE to do any synchronous work.

3. Do not record lectures unless you need to. (This is fundamentally different from designing an online course, where recorded information is, I think, really important.) They will be a low priority for students, and they take up a lot of resources on your end and on theirs. You have already built a rapport with them, and they don’t need to hear your voice to remember that.

4. Do record lectures if you need to. When information cannot be learned otherwise, include a lecture. Your university already has some kind of tech to record lectures. DO NOT simply record in PowerPoint as the audio quality is low. While many people recommend lectures of only 5 minutes, I find that my students really do listen to longer lectures. Still, remember that your students will be frequently interrupted in their listening, so a good rule is 1 concept per lecture. So, rather than a lecture on ALL of, say, gender inequality in your Intro to Soc course, deliver 5 minutes on pay inequity (or 15 minutes or 20 minutes, if that’s what you need) and then a separate lecture on #MeToo and yet another on domestic violence. Closed caption them using the video recording software your university provides. Note that YouTube also generates closed captions [edited to add: they are not ADA compliant, though]. If you don’t have to include images, skip the video recording and do a podcast instead.

5. Don’t fuss too much about the videos. You don’t need to edit out the “umms” or the postal carrier ringing the doorbell. Editing is a waste of your time right now.

6. Make all work due on the same day and time for the rest of the semester. I recommend Sunday night at 11:59 pm. Students who are now stay-at-home parents will need help from others to get everything done, and that help is more likely to arrive on a weekend. While, in general, I dislike 11:59 due dates because work done that late is typically of lower quality, some people will need to work after the kids go to bed, so setting the deadline at 9 or 10 pm just doesn’t give them enough time.

7. If you use a textbook, your publisher probably has tests that you can download directly into your learning management system (LMS). Now is the time to use them. Despite publishers’ best efforts, these tests quickly float around online, so take a few minutes to add some anti-cheating protections. First, organize questions into test banks and have them fed to students at random. For example, if you want to ask two questions about pay inequity, select 5 of them from the test bank, and have your LMS feed two of them to students at random. This makes it MUCH harder for students to work together, because they will never get the same exact test as a peer. Second, change the wording on the questions so they can’t easily paste them into Google. In example questions, changing the name of the person in the example is one fast way to make the questions harder to locate online.

8. Allow every exam or quiz to be taken at least twice, and tell students that this means that if there is a tech problem on the first attempt, the second attempt is their chance to correct it. This will save you from the work of resetting tests or quizzes when the internet fails or some other tech problem happens. And since it can be very hard to discern when such failures are really failures or students trying to win a second attempt at a quiz or test, you avoid having to deal with cheaters.

9. Do NOT require students to use online proctoring or force them to have themselves recorded during exams or quizzes. This is a fundamental violation of their privacy, and they did NOT sign up for that when they enrolled in your course. Plus, they are in the privacy of their homes, sometimes with children who will interrupt them. It may be impossible for them to take a test without interruption. Circumvent the need for proctoring by making every exam open-notes, open-book, and open-internet. The best way to avoid them taking tests together or sharing answers is to use a large test bank.

10. You have already had some kind of in-class work, I’m guessing, so you do not need to further authenticate their identities on exams. If you are suspicious that a student is cheating–for example, someone was previously performing very poorly on in-class assessments and is now scoring very well, which might make you think that they’ve hired someone else to take the class for them–address that situation individually.

11. Remind them of due dates. It might feel like handholding, but be honest: Don’t you appreciate the text reminder from your dentist that you have an appointment tomorrow? Your LMS has an announcement system that allows you to write an announcement now and post it later. As you put your materials online, write an announcement reminding them of the due date to be released 24 hours before it is due. The morning of, send a note to everyone who has not yet turned it in. (In Canvas and Blackboard, you do this by going into your gradebook and right clicking on the header of the assignment. You’ll see an option to email all students who have not yet completed the work. It takes less than 1 minute if you are already logged in.)

12. Alert them to any material that is not appropriate for children to watch, including minute markers for scenes of violence or nudity. Again, you need to assume that they are doing their work with children in the background.

13. Make everything self-grading if you can (yes, multiple choice and T/F on quizzes and tests) or low-stakes (completed/not completed).

14. Don’t do too much. Right now, your students don’t need it. They need time to do the other things they need to do.

15. Listen for them asking for help. They may be anxious. They may be tired. Many students are returning to their parents’ home where they may not be welcome. Others will be at home with partners who are violent. School has been a safe place for them, and now it’s not available to them. Your class may matter to them a lot when they are able to focus on it, but it may not matter much now, in contrast to all the other things they have to deal with. Don’t let that hurt your feelings, and don’t hold it against them in future semesters or when they come back to ask for a letter of recommendation.

****

This advice is very different from that which I would share if you were designing an online course. I hope it’s helpful, and for those of you moving your courses online, I hope it helps you understand the labor that is required in building an online course a bit better.

Like what you read? Support it.

500 thoughts on “Please do a bad job of putting your courses online

Add yours

  1. Thank you for your comments. Those who don’t have these problems are fortunate. Shutdown for coronavirus is a unique situation, not for the long haul. If we do the best we can to help our students get the most they can, we have all done our jobs. A little common sense and perspective are good things in moments like these.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. It is also important to consider non STEM classes and majors. How will a literature class hold discussions without meeting at the same time? Many majors are not exam focused but rather project (communications, art) or essay (literature, languages, social science) .

    Like

  3. The audience this article is targeting os not me BUT….2cents..
    Your students know less about technology than you think. Many of them know less than you. Yes, even if they are digital natives and younger than you.- Not true in my high school

    They will be accessing the internet on their phones. They have limited data. They need to reserve it for things more important than online lectures. Again…not in my school. The students are on their phones and have a million apps going all day. The only obstacle is charging Online classes mean probabaly only core but the with google hangouts etc, even PE can get in on this.

    Students who did not sign up for an online course have no obligation to have a computer, high speed wifi, a printer/scanner, or a camera. Do not even survey them to ask if they have it. Even if they do, they are not required to tell you this. And if they do now, that doesn’t mean that they will when something breaks and they can’t afford to fix it because they just lost their job at the ski resort or off-campus bookstore. Our school district is one to one. EACH student has a laptop loaned by the district.

    Students will be sharing their technology with other household members. They may have LESS time to do their schoolwork, not more. –That is a parenting issue in our paradigm. SIblings eac have their own. The student lap top is intende for family use but the priority is the student.

    Many will be working MORE, not fewer, hours. Nurses, prison guards, firefighters, and police officers have to go to work no matter what. As healthcare demand increases but healthcare workers get sick, there will be more and more stress on those who remain. NA for my paradigm.

    Some of your students will get sick. Others will be caring for people who are ill.
    Many will be parenting.- We have teem Moms and Dads. The strong and well supported get it done. The rest don’t succeed ( at this point) on line or not.
    Social isolation contributes to mental health problems.-CYberbullying may increase but the consequences will remain the same IF the occasions are during school hours /Logged in time.
    Social isolation contributes to domestic violence.- I got nothing. Staying home makes this worse, then.
    Students will be losing their jobs, especially those in tourism and hospitality. NA for our paradigm, Although with out a bell schedule they may have more time to go to work.

    Like

  4. It is also important fo think about non STEM majors. For instance how are literature classes going to hold discussions without meeting at the same time? Many majors also are not exam focused but rather project (art, communications) or essay (languages, literature).

    Like

    1. Do you ever have good asynchronous discussions about literature with friends online? It might not be ideal, but it’s better than allow tech to be a barrier to engagement.

      Like

  5. She doesn’t want how much of a fruad the actual cost of college is to become apparent when they make ten cent online classrooms that does the same job. Can’t hate her for working on her job security.

    Like

    1. That’s not what I’m arguing at all. If we didn’t have brick-and-mortar institutions, I couldn’t do my own job. I need the library, for starters.

      Though I’m proud to teach at an affordable public university, I appreciate the many people who work at more costly institutions as well.

      Of course I care deeply about the cost of college, the impact of college debt (which falls heavier to women), and fraud in the system. I write about these topics often. But online learning isn’t going to save us from those (though it can be part of a solution)

      Like

  6. Many thanks for these thoughtful recommendations. So many middle school and high school teachers are also taking their classrooms online right now. Would you consider adding on to your article to address the concerns of those teachers?

    Like

  7. Thank you for this. I’m an adjunct at a couple colleges in the Chicago area. I don’t have much choice in what I teach, where I teach, when I teach, and how I teach. I’m just glad to have a full slate of classes, especially in the spring semester, when sections are harder to come by in the English Department. But I often end up with an odd assortment of courses. This semester, for example, I am teaching 5 very different courses, which means 5 very different preps: 2 first year writing courses at very different colleges, with very different learning outcomes; a 100-level literature course; a 200-level lit course, and a 300-level lit course. Oh, and not to mention 2 very different learning management systems. It can be fun, but it also can be dizzying. Each course is very, very different.

    My point is: The idea of moving online 5 very different courses, all with very different learning objectives and structures, is very intimidating. I really want things to go well and for the learning to continue. But my intuition tells me that it’s going to be messy, no matter how many Chronicle of Higher Ed articles or online learning instructional seminars I cram in these next couple weeks. I thinks most adjunct with Frankenstein schedules like mine know this.

    So reading your piece validated some of the fear that I was afraid to admit just as much as it gave me the courage to move forward.

    By the way, I appreciate your pushback on the use of the word “delivery” in the educational context (in a comment, I think). I wish that teachers would stop using that word when referring to what it is that they do in the classroom. (As if one’s just backing up a cargo van to the classroom door.) It seems that many of the angry commenters have internalized the rot of higher ed these past 30 years and see the classroom (virtual and physical) as a zone of transaction rather than of mutual exploration and learning.

    So far, colleagues at both my schools have shared this via social media, so it’s spreading widely! If only department chairs and tenured faculty members could read this–they’re the ones issuing directives these next few weeks who need to hear this the most.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thank you for sharing this perspective, which is the perspective of the majority of people teaching: those whose work is precarious. I hate that you’ve had this burden out on you, and your case really illustrates the impact of this problem on learning, the very thing we say we’re about!

      Thank you for this great contribution, which I know will give folks a lot to think about (even the ones who resist recognizing their responsibility for the problem!)

      Like

  8. I find this extremely valuable, and I’ve shared it with the graduate students in my department’s Ph.D. program, most of whom are graduate instructors and are dealing with having to suddenly move their courses online. This outlines some very useful considerations.
    Nate M

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Rebecca,
    We have known each other a long time and while I understand your sentiments and think your heart is in the right place, there is a fair amount of rhetoric and grandstanding here.
    Many of these students who work full-time and parent and are paying for their education need the best education we can provide to them, especially now.
    Claiming they cannot learn or learn well in a new format is a form of paternalism that reminds me of people telling me that poor students of color like me could not handle higher education.
    While we do have a number of students who are parents, most of my first-year college students do not have children. Moreover, several of them have told me they would prefer to have synchronous classes during our class time.
    Will you really resort to calling our educators who try to do what their administrators and chairs tell them? Is this a John Hughes movie and you are asssuming the Judd Nelson role? It is beneath you, Rebecca.
    As someone who has spent the better part of the last decade delivering synchronous classes to both international and domestic students, I have an experience different from many teachers. I enjoy being back in classroom settings too. Crises often force us to adapt to new methods and technologies we would not normally use, so please don’t judge those who find online learning appealing. This suggest a parochial pedagogy that would surprise me given what I know about you.
    Know we should not milk ourselves to remake our classes online, but encouraging people to do it poorly on purpose is ultimately a disservice to the students you purport to be in solidarity with.
    Sincerely,
    Nic S

    Like

    1. Thank you for writing, Nic. I value your insights based on your experiences. I also feel misread.

      I’m not encouraging people to do a poor job of REMOTE teaching; I’m saying that we will do a better job of it if we aren’t trying to build online courses to standards that are attainable with resources and training and time but aren’t attainable when you have one weekend to attend to four classes. A terrific online course uses tech and skills that are unfamiliar to many students who have chosen F2F over online courses for a reason–often because they lack the resources to succeed online like they want to. Many of them have already tried and decided it wasn’t for them. In terms of tuition, there is unfairness in demanding that students who didn’t sign up for an online class now pay for one. (And yet I don’t see a better option–except to make this experience one where the online-ness presents the smallest barrier possible, which is what I advocate.)

      Liked by 1 person

  10. Thanks for you article, I really needed that info and inspiration! I am a former lawyer of many years who just started teaching 3 years ago. I work very hard to interact personally with my sophomores in US History Classes. Getting them talking to each other respectfully, thoughtfully, and arguing points with evidence is my daily goal (some days are better than others). Of course, that can be completely different face to face than on-line. I’m hoping that approach has a positive effect in this conflicted and disunited world.

    I get that I’m a technology immigrant, and I probably need to stop being a Luddite, but I hope our technology only classes don’t last too long. We already have technology bombarding us. There’s room for positive human interaction in a classroom.

    The least effective classes I’ve ever taken were on line. I’ve never had an epiphany or inspiration from another student on-line. I worry that I’ll lapse into the ease of creating a mind numbing spate of on line classes. I’m going to have to reach really hard for some creativity. And I worry that I won’t be able to see my students faces to know how their feeling and doing.

    Thanks again, you wrote a lot about what I was thinking.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Thank you so much for recognizing some profound barriers that students face when changing learning environments. I shared your article with many who are struggling to feel safe and able to meet the learning challenges ahead with the new off-campus format. Please forgive those who do not understand these realities. Learning at the highest level given the money we spend for the education is the priority…right after caring for our children and our own safety.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Thanks so much for this piece! I am going to share it with my colleagues, many of whom are feeling panicked about the sudden move to remote teaching for our spring quarter. I have many years of F2F teaching experience, and the very limited experience of designing and teaching one online course. The latter experience taught me just how much labor and technical expertise (possessed not by me but by a full-time learning designer) goes into every aspect of online course design. Online courses present a different set of challenges and opportunities than F2F ones, and there is a steep learning curve involved. I’m so grateful for this post’s acknowledgment that none of us can accomplish the work of converting a class that was originally conceived and designed to be taught F2F into a thoughtful online course in the space of a few days. We can still offer our students a lot, and no one is advocating shirking our responsibilities to our students! But as this post makes clear, trying and failing to learn online pedagogy overnight isn’t going to help anyone.

    On a separate note, I was surprised by the vitriol in some of the comments here! But I guess there are trolls everywhere. Sigh.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for these reflections, Kasey! I think the sooner we accept that our greatest ambitions aren’t going to serve our students well, the sooner we will get on with the good teaching that we can still do.

      And thanks for the encouraging words about critics. I am so fortunate to have a community of scholars and teachers who are kind, thoughtful, and encouraging, even when they see a weakness, that it’s been a bit of a surprise to be confronted by people who aren’t that way. But that is just a reminder of how positive and helpful most people are most of the time.

      Like

  13. As someone who has never taught an on-line course in my 31 years of teaching at a research university, I find all of this extremely helpful and eye opening. Unfortunately (or fortunately) there is no way I can do an outstanding job because it clearly takes much more time and effort than I have available in the next few weeks of the semester.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. You should be fired. What a disgrace. I will do my best to make sure media outlets see how you want to sandbag education to save your job as a teacher. Pathetic.

    Like

    1. Hmmm… I think maybe you need to read more carefully my advice.

      Or maybe think why, during a time of national crisis, you would put your energy into threatening a media campaign to get me fired. Maybe you could take that effort and put it into, like, distributing homemade hand sanitizer to people who are homeless or organizing a fundraiser for your local domestic abuse shelter.

      Or call your elderly parents or grandparents and tell them you love them.

      Or something more useful than threatening my job. I’m fairly sure my students’ success weighs more heavily in my retention than does your anger.

      Like

  15. When preparing for the shut-down, I began setting up a platform to communicate with my students. I worked with them and listened to their input as to what will work best. I am interested in making the best of this situation while we are stuck in it. My students appreciate my concern for them and doing what I can and what I cannot do during social isolation. They helped me with some suggestions they prefer. I am employing options that they had input on. I will give them opportunity to make up work if they are simply unable to complete work at this time. The take-home message is to listen to your students. For the most part, they want to do the right thing and then stay positive.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. 1 – yes, students signed up for a course, no matter the format. 2 – yes, instructors deliver a product. It is the knowledge in the subject of the and the critical thinking that is required to manipulate that information. 3 – I live in the land of floods and tornadoes…there is nothing you can teach me about modifying schedules and instruction for these types of situations.

    The opinions you try to elevate to action would do nothing more than cheat the student of the quality instruction for which they paid, and make it easier for students that otherwise would not pass to get another chance with extended deadlines and multiple attempts to pass tests. I, for one, do not want a nurse, doctor, or accountant that “just got by.”

    Like

    1. No one is arguing for lowering standards of student learning.

      Many students are unprepared for online learning—like, literally, do not own a computer. They signed up for a class on a campus where they could go to the computer lab when they needed a computer and to a classroom when they needed to engage with a professor and their peers. We cannot expect students who agreed to one kind of class to be ready to learn in another. That’s disrespectful of them.

      Asking them to buy a computer and a webcam, to secure access to high speed WiFi, and to create time and space to engage in synchronous work is fundamentally different from asking them to take a F2F class.

      If your students are ready to make the switch and have all the tech in place to make it happen, awesome! Many of us aren’t teaching those students.

      Like

  17. Rebecca, I provided you with the same level of antagonism that your article title instigates. Instead of focusing on my message you responded with a knee-jerk reaction to criticize my ability to read. I read what you wrote and responded with a mentality that focuses on providing my students with the best that I can accomplish in this situation with the expectation that they will also do the same. You falsely interpreted my meaning to be inappropriate, I wouldn’t hesitate to fail you and give you an unsatisfactory for your give-up attitude (” Don’t do too much. Right now, your students don’t need it. They need time to do the other things they need to do.) They are still paying a large amount of money for instruction, they don’t need me provide them excuses to not do the work required. I also believe they need some level of normalcy and consistency, otherwise we all should have just cancelled our classes instead.

    There is also mention of kindness and community in my post, not the same with yours. Your blanket statements do not apply to all situations and I find your assumption that students will not rise to this occasion insulting to them and their adaptability. If you underestimate them and their circumstances, you will fail to provide to them the opportunity to demonstrate how much they can achieve. They can succeed if you guide them and provide them some level of structure to the chaos caused by this virus. You mask your step back from responsibility with an equal decrease in their responsibilities and at some level this comes across as faux concern, “All of these factors mean that your students are facing more important battles today than your class–if they are even able to access it….Your class may matter to them a lot when they are able to focus on it, but it may not matter much now, in contrast to all the other things they have to deal with. Don’t let that hurt your feelings, and don’t hold it against them in future semesters or when they come back to ask for a letter of recommendation.” Don’t let it hurt your feelings that I STRONGLY disagree with you in regards to how to proceed. Hold yourself and students to higher expectations, and manage things appropriately and with compassion and kindness when they cannot achieve them perfectly. Use this as a teaching moment and guide them with resiliency of your own in demonstrating that imperfect situations allow us to maximize creativity and emphasize collaboration and learn from failures. Further if GE and electives are not as important, why do we bother putting effort into teaching them in first place? You wanted to be edgy with your article, and you were, I just don’t find your advice or position on the role students will play in this developing situation the least bit helpful. You will feel like you succeeded because you set the bare minimum of expectations, but you will be letting down your students when they need you to guide them.

    I also believe that our circumstances and that of our students is likely different. Your message may apply to your typical class make up, and does seem like reasonable generalization of some of my former classes at different institutions, however it’s not a one-size-fits-all approach to this situation, and I for one plan to keep teaching and encouraging my students to learn to the best of my ability.

    Like

    1. Lots of people have found what I shared to be helpful. If you don’t, that’s fine—it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution, nor did I claim it was. If you think you have something that could help others, go ahead and share it on your own platform. Maybe it will be helpful to people who share your orientation to teaching.

      Like

  18. Your entry has been so helpful to me, Rebecca, and everything you say makes perfect sense from both a pedagogical and a practical stand point. it has also been shared amongst all my colleagues. Of the overwhelming amount of links and resources that have been shared by everyone in the last few days and hours, your points are the ones that have helped me start organizing my thoughts in a sane manner. Thank you so much for taking the time to share your valuable insights.

    Like

  19. Retired prof here. Very tech savvy. Agree completely. In fact, for those who know they are about to be sucked into the online course vortex, do a lousy job. Education isn’t about delivering information, it’s about learning, processing, analyzing, which cannot be done in isolation. Resist. We all really know that “moving courses online” for the remainder of the semester is just a ruse to bring some kind of closure. Fine. Don’t let it be more than that.
    Back in 1970, my university shut down over student protests ..no classes, no exams, no graduation…..they survived and learned a lesson more important than we could teach them….they actually helped stop the. Vietnam War. They will learn from this crisis, too, even if it won’t be from the last few chapters of their textbooks.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. I find this article offering solid advice from someone who probably is an excellent teacher regardless of the medium. Nothing in her piece says we cannot provide a robust and productive experience for our student, so please do not get it twisted. The only issue for me is that I hope that our system has the mainframe capacity to handle the sudden rush to online. My sources in IT at the school and in engineering say “no.” How ’bout ‘dat?

    Like

    1. Yeah, I would NOT want to be in IT now. Not just because they are slammed but because they are going to have to nicely and patiently explain to people with impossible demands that they just can’t do it. Like, you can’t just think these things into happening–there are material conditions that have to be in place.

      Like

  21. Hi Professor! I just started in a part-time administrative position with a community college. It’s my first foray into higher ed. I graduated from college four years ago, so I understand the stress of students. However, the college is not, in my opinion, handling this well. There are very few full-time faculty. Most of the professors are adjuncts. The college has told faculty that it’s up to them to move their classes online, which isn’t a consistent policy. Students are confused and nervous, and this policy isn’t helping. At our satellite site (where I work), most of the adjuncts do not know how to use basic technology. I often have to help them in the classroom. I can’t imagine them going to online successfully. Ironically, my mom is attending the same college as I am working at (weird, I know), and she says her professor for one of her classes cannot figure out how to run an online class, and this class is specifically prepared for online! I’m really nervous about the future of the college. It also doesn’t help that my job is kind of jeopardy, because I have no idea if I get paid if the college completely shuts down (but that’s a story for another time).

    Anyway, thank you for the article! I’ll be sure to share.

    Emily

    Like

  22. From the 60’s but appropriate. If they find your online work is so good, they will let you go. Save your Job!

    Like

    1. While I appreciate that perspective, it’s not my point here.

      Practically, we’re not going to create online classrooms that are good enough to replace us. And our students—none of whom have been prepared for this work and many of whom lack the skills and resources to make this switch—aren’t going to fall in love with online classes based on what we do in the next weeks.

      Which doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be vigilant against disaster capitalism.

      Liked by 1 person

  23. I think this is a cop-out for you and for your students. If you never ask them to adapt and change, how do you ever expect them to grow and learn anything at all? I teach a lab course, which obviously entails hands-on-learning, including use of specialized tools and organisms to study that they won’t have access to at home/ over the internet. I can and will adapt this to an on-line format that is successful to continue to provide the students and myself the experience we deserve. Will it be perfect? No, I can’t manage that in this timeframe, nor am I being asked to do that. What is being asked of me and the other faculty (many of whom are in the high-risk group for severe coronavirus disease) is to provide course content to my students through an on-line format. The amount of resources and time people at my University are spending to help accomplish this goal is outstanding. The kindness offered to each other in this strange time we find ourselves in is what will make the difference going forward. My class met for 9 weeks, a community has developed, we are a team and we will get through this situation together, and it won’t be due to our lack of effort. Your students deserve better, and you deserve a giant F and U, perhaps you should withdraw from your own course if you aren’t willing to put in the effort to teach your subject matter regardless of what level it may be or what format is currently required.

    Like

    1. Your hostility—to tell me to fuck off—has no place in a conversation about how to care for students and ensure that they can learn in a time of crisis. It also sheds doubt on your willingness or ability to collaborate or even to tolerate other perspectives.

      You also seem to have poor reading comprehension skills. Maybe try again, with less anger and more focus on the words on the screen.

      Like

  24. Rebecca,

    Was sent this link via a friend. I find much of your post a necessary corrective to the somewhat idealistic expectations of many faculty, and thus very helpful. I have many decades of experience in this regard as instructor and creator. I must disagree with two of your points (though I see value in them, I must add) in the “You” list.

    I learned a long time ago that (in my discipline) you must put more effort into the GenEd courses, not less. You may never “see” these students again, and never have another chance to impact their learning. It’s also a recruiting tool (to be perfectly practical about it). For me, if you’ve done your job at preparing students for major courses, then they will do all the work themselves, with little beyond encouragement and correction from you. Your recommendation reads to me like “I only work to focus on stuff I like”, which is a terrible self-justification for have a job in education. Too many damned self-serving folks in HE already.

    I have tried the publisher content (in my discipline), and it universally sucks. Worse, it forces your students to pay for something that universally sucks. Aren’t the textbooks themselves awful enough? I don’t want to give the corporate bastards another route to make money from my students, when they have no say-so. Depending on how much more my administration sweats the professorial labor (!), I can say emphatically that this shortcut/hack is worth exactly what you put into it – nothing.

    Please, move #15 to the top of the list. The critical part of online vs. ftf is that with online (non-synchronous, which I totally agree with) is the lack of student focus. Without the discipline of a scheduled meeting for a specific purpose, most students will not be able to focus positively on their learning. In ftf, every class is a special moment in time and space, capable of rising to greatness based on the synergies present in a specific time and place. The critical part of education and learning is how to create the interpersonal synergies to open minds to new possibilities. Educators are not processing biological ingredients for a pre-determined outcome (I hope!). We must create an environment to set our students’ minds free.

    Thanks again for this thoughtful essay.

    Jim

    Like

    1. Thanks for your feedback, Jim.

      My only concern about GEs are for folks who are teaching both GEs and major requirements. We are all going to be forced to triage our time. Is it more sensible to devote more time to Intro to Bio or A&P? Since our nursing students have to take A&P to learn what they need but 95 percent of bio students don’t have to have that particular class as a foundation for something else, I would put more any additional effort I have into A and P. That doesn’t mean neglecting bio—just making sure it is good enough and then using any additional time elsewhere.

      I say this as someone who teaches hundreds of Intro to a Soc students each year, in a dept that relies on GE credits to survive.

      But I also teach our senior capstone, and I will give my extra effort to those graduating now to what is surely going to be a messy job market.

      I don’t recommend asking students to buy anything more (though lots of publishers are making stuff free for them right now), but most into textbooks in major disciplines have a test bank you as the teacher can access. Students don’t need it at all. If you go to the publisher’s site and login, you will eventually be able to find the sources, ready for download. Yeah, a lot of them stink, but I think they can give you a rough draft to revise into tests that are sufficient. Of course, that may vary based on your needs.

      Like

  25. This is complete bullshit. The qualitative factors of instruction and the commitment required for the student do not change because the format changes. You’re fond of saying that the “student didn’t sign up for” whatever…yes, they did. And the instructor is being paid to deliver that product, no mater the technology employed. Anything less is a disservice. And, as far as student’s life stresses outside of the classroom are concerned….it wasn’t your problem before, why is it your problem now? Would you make these allowances if it were a regular course experience?

    Like

    1. No, students didn’t sign up for an online course. Many of them have already found that they are not equipped for online learning—literally, they do not have the equipment.

      Additionally, instructors do not “deliver a product.” That’s not how learning works, whether in a F2F or an online classroom.

      Would I make allowances if a disaster struck in a different situation? Like if a tornado ripped through campus or if my National Guard students were deployed to help with hurricane clean up? Yes.

      Like

  26. Great tips! Fortunately, my employer is reassuring us lots that any effort that we make is better than no effort. Personally, I was already super interested in tech tools and digital learning so it’s become a moment to shine for me. Nevertheless, there are so many new things to focus on that competence is a difficult goal to achieve. As we venture into week 4 of the new normal, I hope to assign more homework so that class time can focus on skill-building, especially interaction. There’s a whole lot of learning, for students and for me. I think that our most important role right now is to maintain a community that feels safe, in times that are fear-provoking, for all of us.

    Like

  27. As a student I’ll say to you, please find a new job! Some of us are ready to finish classes, not fail because our “teacher” doesn’t have the capacity to do what needs to be done.

    Like

    1. I’m not suggesting any teachers fail to do their duty, Chelsea. I am saying that we will be more successful if we try low tech solutions that we already know how to do and that don’t present new barriers to students.

      Like

    1. I think if you follow the advice I offer here, you will do the job well. And if you insist on introducing technology that you or your students aren’t familiar with and cannot reliably access, you will not be an effective teacher.

      Like

  28. “Put your energy into the classes that are required for your major or minor or that are required by other majors or minors. Electives and GE classes are an important part of a good education, but we have already decided that what students learn in any one of those courses is not vital. (The exceptions to this are GE courses that are required for a major.) For some of us, this is every class we teach, but for others, we have the ability to choose to focus our attention.”

    Who the fuck are the people that decided knowledge in GE is less vital? It sure as fuck wasn’t me. This comment irks me. GE courses are just as ‘vital’ because ALL knowledge is vital. Most of the students I teach will not end up being anthropologists, but that doesn’t mean that I, nor anyone else, should consider any knowledge to be more important than other knowledge.

    All the rest, cool.

    Like

    1. I didn’t say that GEs weren’t important. That would be both against what I think (as a graduate of a liberal arts college) and self-undermining (since I teach 300-600 Intro to Soc students each year and since their enrollment is vital to our program survival).

      What I am saying is that, by definition, the university has already decided that no PARTICULAR GE class is vital. That’s why students can choose Intro to Soc or Intro to Psych or Cultural Anthropology or whatever else counts as a social science GE at your university.

      In a time when we ,must make choices about where to spend more and less energy, I think it makes sense to devote more time to classes that are prerequisites. That doesn’t mean neglecting your GE students (esp because those GEs ARE prerequisites for some courses), but it may mean that I have to devote more energy to make sure that my Social Stats students are prepared for Applied Research.

      Some people don’t have to make this choice at all since they only teach GEs and so will be giving all their attention to them. Others only teach electives or only teach major requirements. We’ll each have to figure out the balance. You do you, and I’m sure you’ll soon figure out if it’s the right choice and, if not, correct course.

      Like

  29. Thank you for this, which I have found enormously helpful as we are in this situation exactly at my institution. And FYI, our student support center staff shared it with all of our faculty. It may be the most helpful thing that has come out of our administration since the COVID-19 chaos began. I have also shared it with 2000 colleagues on an academic listserve for which I am admin, and have seen it re-posted from there to another with a wide readership. I hope it helps many many people.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you, Rich, for this encouraging feedback! I’m really glad that it’s resonating with faculty, support staff, and others—we need solidarity now more than ever!

      Like

  30. Great article; an easy, meaningful, and engaging read with lots of good information and a refreshing perspective for the immediate term.

    BUUUUUUTTTT…
    I think that there is at least one huge piece of the puzzle missing here…

    … What do we do if campuses are still closed next semester when all we’ve created are bad online courses?

    I’m here to say that we can keep the transition pressure low for now, while also preparing to allow universities to offer viable products that can righteously keep them alive through the coming semesters; if need be.

    Consider the following:

    It is easier to learn how to use a fully-built LMS course than to build one from scratch
    — So, profs should be asked to find LMS-courses (from their peers and public repositories)
    90+% of all online university courses are housed within any one of only four LMSs
    — So, it’s quite likely that valuable courses already exist that can be widely shared.
    We can finish out this semester using found online courses, while grading lightly
    — Providing a low-stakes environment for profs and students to learn the LMS that will keep University “doors” open at should a second semester of closures be enforced, while providing resources that were good enough for peer institutions or the public at large (if using a MOOC).

    Like

  31. Here are the things that I believe:

    Zoom is a online conferencing system used by the California Community Colleges among others:

    Synchronous meetings online are nothing to fear. In fact, if you can just log on with your students on Zoom, share your screen, talk through a PowerPoint or hold live speeches, and get students talking too, it’s amazing. I was telling faculty members today that once I have finished a week’s worth of lectures, I cannot honestly tell the difference in my memory which lecture was online and which was F2F. Even if your students are completely LOST online, once they find their way to the session, the synchronous Zoom events can be EXACTLY like being in class. EXACTLY. You lose NOTHING. And in my opinion the synchronous events are easier than creating a bunch of random assignments using the asynchronous modality (asynchronous means it is NOT live and students can access it anytime). You can ALSO RECORD the Zoom session to share later on, so it can have both modalities, in the live synchronous modality as well as the recorded asynchronous version. If classes have been moved online from the face-to-face venue, you can and should use Zoom or similar conferencing systems (like gotomeeting) at the same time period as the original face-to-face class. Easy peasy.

    Students CAN access ZOOM on their phones. I have NOT run into a student since we started using ZOOM three years ago, who could not access a session because they lacked the technology. A SMART burner phone can run Zoom. That was THE WHOLE REASON we moved to Zoom in the first place. So when experts decry the fact that students will be accessing your synchronous sessions and online materials on THEIR PHONES, yessiree that’s exactly what they can and should be doing. It took a great deal of effort and online expertise for California Community Colleges to create systems that were mobile and phone friendly. USE IT!

    Rebecca Barrett-Fox writes, “Please do a bad job putting your classes online. I’m absolutely serious.” I know that’s not exactly what she meant (while it is literally what she wrote), but come on. We don’t toss out best practices just because it’s an emergency. Faculty such as myself who have been teaching online for 20 years can help; just ask.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to EllenJoanneCampbell (@ElleninSaigon) Cancel reply

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑